Gardner v. Gardner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
At the outset we think it important to say that we are not inadvertent to the proposition that the Court of Appeals’ denial of defendant’s application for a writ of certiorari was a ruling within the discretion of that court. Normally we would not interfere with the exercise of such discretion. We determined to take this case, however, not because we thought the Court of Appeals by denying defendant’s application had abused its discretion, but because we desired to address the important and novel questions relating to the applicability of the compulsory counterclaim provisions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Irwin H. Lawhorn v. The Atlantic Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Fawkes v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Kemp v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.