Legal Opinion

Mancilla v. Greg

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1998No. 23651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal by appellant David G. Pena (Pena), an attorney, from an order of the Industrial Commission (Commission) denying Pena’s motion to reconsider a previous order which partially denied attorney fees requested by Pena in a workers’ compensation case. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On October 12, 1993, Leovigildo Mancilla (Mancilla) suffered a work related accident while employed at Pahl Farms. Pahl Farms provided workers’ compensation insurance coverage through surety State Insurance Fund (SIF). Mancilla’s injury involved his right thumb being severed. At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Matter of WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rhodes v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Reedy v. M.H. King Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lamar Corp. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Green River Ranches, LLC v. Silva Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Mulder v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Seiniger Law Offices, P.A. v. State Ex Rel. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API