Legal Opinion

Lamar Corp. v. City of Twin Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1999No. 24304PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

The City Council of the City of Twin Falls (City Council) and City of Twin Falls (collectively, City) appeal a decision of the district court reversing a zoning decision of the City Council. The City Council had denied the application of Idaho Outdoor Advertising 1 (Idaho Outdoor) for a special use permit to erect a billboard. The district court reversed, ruling that the Twin Falls zoning ordinance unconstitutionally limited commercial speech. The City also appeals the district court’s denial of its request to delete certain materials from the transcript and record on appeal.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Edmunds v. KranerIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sword v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API