Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Industrial Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1993PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Respondent, the Industrial Commission of the State of Idaho (“Commission”), has authority to adopt rules and regulations pursuant to I.C. § 72-508. The Commission must comply with the administrative procedures governing the enactment of administrative regulations codified as I.C. § 67-5203. In August 1992, based on extensive research1 prompted by a major concern that fees charged by claimants’ attorneys in workers’ compensation cases were unduly high, the Commission published a draft of formal regulations which proposed mandatory attorney fee…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Department of Labor v. TriplettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wagner v. AGW CONSULTANTSNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Matter of WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API