Seiniger Law Offices, P.A. v. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal out of Ada County challenging the administrative rule adopted by the Industrial Commission in 1994 that regulates the amount of attorney fees allowable for attorneys representing claimants in worker’s compensation proceedings. We uphold the validity of the rule.
I
Factual Background.
The Idaho Industrial Commission (Commission) adopted an administrative rule that took effect on July 1, 1994, and that regulated the amount of fees that an attorney could recover from a claimant in a worker’s compensation proceeding. IDAPA 17.02.08.033 (1994). Seiniger Law Offices,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Callies v. O'NEALIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Rhodes v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Curr v. CurrIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Verdene Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Oliveros v. Rule Steel Tanks, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Oliveros v. Rule SteelIdaho Supreme Court · 2019