Mulder v. Liberty Northwest Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
NATURE OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from an Idaho Industrial Commission (the Commission) order granting claimant medical benefits because of work-related bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background.
Gerald Mulder (Mulder) was employed by appellant, Liberty Northwest Insurance Company (Liberty) as a senior loss prevention consultant. Liberty is a worker’s compensation surety and as senior loss prevention consultant, Mulder traveled to Liberty’s various insured customers to assist in safety training programs and to help…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Marshall v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wheeler v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Valiant Idaho, LLC v. JV L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Steele v. City of ShelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.