Harney v. Benson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is a street assessment case, and the appeal is from the judgment, and was taken within sixty days after its rendition.
*316The charge is for the construction of a trunk or main sewer on Fourteenth avenue. • In the resolution of intention it was declared that the work was of more than local or ordinary benefit, and the expense was made a charge upon a district which was defined by and in the resolution.
On October 20, 1890, the board had adopted plans for the sewerage of that locality, and had made a map of a system of sewers, of which the sewer in question constituted a part. The scheme…
2Cited by8 opinions
- O'Dea v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Brydon v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- St. John v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Butters v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- City Street Improvement Co. v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.