Legal Opinion

Brydon v. City of Hermosa Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1928No. Docket No. 6111PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZLETT, J., pro tem.

This is an action for an injunction against the City of Hermosa Beach, the mayor, the members of the city council, and superintendent of streets of the city, to enjoin them from receiving any bids or making any contracts for the construction of certain street improvements upon certain public streets in the city, and from levying any assessment or taking other proceedings in the matter, and to enjoin a certain other action predicated in eminent domain, and for general relief. Plaintiff Brydon and other parties plaintiff brought this action as owners in the district of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API