Textile Corp. v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.
The judgment of the court below, that “plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, as a preferred claim against the assets of the North Carolina Bank and Trust Company, the sum of $173.93,” must be sustained. Under chapter 103, Public Laws of 1933, the North Carolina Bank and Trust Company limited withdrawals by any depositor, to five per cent of deposits at the close of business on 2 March, 1933. The plaintiff was solvent and its checking account at that time was $8,447.72 — five per cent of which was withdrawn in accordance with the restriction. On this appeal, the only items now in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Holloman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Thomas v. ConyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Herring v. Volume Merchandise, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bank of Beaufort v. Commercial National Bank of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Squire, Supt. v. GoulderOhio Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.