Legal Opinion · Dissent

Squire, Supt. v. Goulder

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1936No. 25800Published

1DissentZimmerman, J.

Everyone agrees that if the relationship between defendant in error and The Standard Trust Bank with reference to the checks deposited by the former on December 19, 1931, was that of principal and agent, defendant in error is entitled to the priority claimed, but if the relationship was that of creditor and debtor, he is not. The lower courts determined from the evidence that the status of principal and agent was established. I think they were right. Any other conclusion requires the, indulgence of assumptions which the evidence will not support.

It appears from the record that defendant in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Old National Bank v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Bath National Bank v. Ely N. Sonnenstrahl, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Fayette National Bank v. SummersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API