Legal Opinion

Bank of Beaufort v. Commercial National Bank of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabesoN, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions and in this we can see no error.

On motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, the evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.

An exception to a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit taken at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and renewed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Bank of Vance v. CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Wood v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hensley v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Hensley v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API