First National Bank of Columbus v. Rochamora
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Clarkson, I.
“If you find that the plaintiff bought the paper, that is, in due course, as I have defined that term, and did not take it as an agent for collection, then your answer to the first issue would be ‘yes’; if you do not so find, your answer to the first issue would be ‘no.’ If as purchaser in due course, if the plaintiff has satisfied you by the greater weight of the evidence of that, your answer to the first issue would be ‘yes,’ if not, and you find that the bank accepted it as a collecting agent, your answer to the first issue would be ‘no.’ ” Plaintiff assigns error. The main…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Dyer v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Webster v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.