Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State Corp. Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1943No. 35,970PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This case arises under the oil-proration law. Oil in *590excess of the “allowables” having been produced from certain wells, the State Corporation Commission issued an order charging the overage to the lease from which it had been produced. On appeal by the lessee and operator the district court set aside the order and the commission appeals. Was the order valid?

The material facts can be briefly stated. In February, 1942, the commission instituted an investigation into alleged violations of its oil production orders by a number of oil operators.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. State Corp. Commission of Kansas v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Bay Petroleum Corporation v. Corporation CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Woods v. Midwest Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Bissell v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API