Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Bond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1935No. 26297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an original action in this court by the state on relation of Lon Huddleston against Reford Bond, Jack Walton, and A. S. J. Shaw, as members of and constituting the State Corporation Commission, in which relator seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit the Corporation Commission from enforcing, as against him, its order No. 8674, and particularly section 11 thereof, which is as follows:

“11. All underproduction to the credit of any well in the Wilcox zone as of 7 o’clock a. m., on the 1st day of April, 1935, shall be canceled and charged off by the umpire; provided that, underproduction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Sterling Refining Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia RailRoad v. New WhatcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Application of BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. British American Oil Producing Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API