Legal Opinion
H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Bond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 1935No. 26131PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSBORN, V. C. J..On April 12, 1934, the H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as applicant, filed an application with the Corporation Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, in which it was sought to obtain an increased allowable for five of its wells producing from the Wilcox zone, in the Oklahoma City field.
On June 15, 1934, the Commission’ dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction. Mandamus proceedings were instituted in this court, And on July 31, 1934, a writ was issued directing the Commission to grant a hearing on the application. (H. F. Wilcox Oil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Russell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Bennett v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Greyhound Leasing & Financial Corporation, on Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated v. Joiner City UnitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Corporation Commission v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.