Legal Opinion

Rush v. King Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1976No. 47,948PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

Action was brought in the trial court to obtain partial cancellation of an oil and gas lease covering 160 acres of land in Graham County, Kansas. The plaintiff, lessor, alleged that the present owners of the lease had failed to fulfill the implied covenants in the lease which require further development under the prudent operator test.

The action was fully tried by experienced counsel before a seasoned trial judge. As might be expected the testimony of the competing experts in the case was in sharp conflict as to need for further development.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bell v. TiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. Southwest Kansas Royalty Owners Ass'n v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Laurest J. Trahan, Cross-Appellees v. Superior Oil Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API