Legal Opinion

Bilotta v. Labor Pool of St. Paul, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1982No. 81-1126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals denying a petition for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits paid by relator, Labor Pool of St. Paul, Inc. (Labor Pool), brought against Safelite Industries, Inc. (Safelite), and its insurer, Home Insurance Company. We affirm.

Albert J. Bilotta was employed by relator Labor Pool and injured while working for respondent Safelite as a temporary employee. Labor Pool is an employment broker whose general function is to supply temporary personnel to companies for short-term assistance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  3. Associated Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Johnson v. McGough Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Rademaker v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Temporary Staffing, Inc. v. J.J. Haines & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Virginia Polytechnic & State University v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. Bowens v. Allied Warehousing Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API