Legal Opinion

Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1977No. 46645PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Meldrum Manufacturing and Engineering Company, Inc. (Meldrum). The trial court found as a matter of law that plaintiff Geradeen Danek, employed by Labor Pool of St. Paul, Inc. (Labor Pool), was also an employee of Meldrum when she was injured while operating Meldrum’s punch press machine, and was thus barred by the provisions of the workers’ compensation law from suing Meldrum as a third-party tortfeasor. 'For the reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm.

Labor Pool is a labor broker in the business…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Daniels v. MacGregor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  5. Chickachop v. Manpower, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Bennett v. Mid-South Terminals Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. USA Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. LoveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API