Legal Opinion
St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1962No. 3-62-Civ. 18PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, District Judge.
This is a tort case and jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the required amount. The plaintiff allegedly entered the employ of Manpower, Inc. (Manpower) some short time prior to July 21, 1961.
Manpower is a corporation whose general function is to supply personnel as a part of its service to companies which have need for its service and personnel, either on special projects or to fill in a day or so. Manpower made an oral agreement with Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc. (defendant) to furnish personnel to fill in the temporary labor needs of defendant.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Krause v. Trustees of Hamline University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Dahl v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Melhus v. Sam Johnson Sons Fisheries Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3Cited by44 opinions
- Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Sorenson v. Colibri Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.