Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill Foundation
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Justice.
Following the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) disposition of this case by published opinion, filed on May 29, 1998, petitioners-appellees Hawaii Planing Mill Foundation and Hawaii Planing Mill, Ltd. (collectively HPM or statutory employer 1 ) petitions this court for a writ of certiorari. 2 HPM argues that the ICA erred in holding that respondent-appellant Peter Frank was permitted to bring a negligence action against HPM, notwithstanding his workers’ compensation award. 3
On July 2, 1998, we granted HPM’s petition for a writ of certiorari. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Northern Elec. Co. v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. HymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Nautilus Ins. Co. v. K. Smith Builders, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.