Legal Opinion
Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1994No. C6-94-384PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants, owners of a trucking company, brought this action for an accounting of premiums owed under an insurance policy issued by respondent Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Assigned Risk Plan (MWCARP). The insurance carrier had assessed workers’ compensation insurance premiums against appellants for drivers appellants leased from an out-of-state driver leasing company.
The district court granted summary judgment to MWCARP. It determined that appellants were “employers” of the leased drivers for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act. The district court awarded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Transp. Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
- Damgaard v. Avera HealthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Skogquist Trucking & Excavating Inc. v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk PlanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Transp. Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
- Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2004