Associated Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Justice.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, after paying a workmen’s compensation claim, sued Associated Indemnity Company, alleging that the payment was made for Associated’s benefit because the loss was covered by Associated’s policy. Both par ties moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied Associated’s motion and granted Hartford’s, and Associated appeals.
The question presented is: May the workmen’s compensation carrier of a contractor supplying temporary labor, after accepting premiums collected by the contractor from its customers, and after paying a claim to an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- German Bank of Memphis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Insurors Indemnity & Insurance v. PridgenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Brown v. Aztec Rig Equipment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Texas Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n v. National American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Carr v. Carroll Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.