Legal Opinion

Hargett v. . Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

The argument submitted.by plaintiff on his appeal from the judgment of nonsuit treats the case as one in ejectment, but this is not the theory upon which it was tried in the court below. An appeal ex necessitate follows the theory of the trial. Walker v. Burt, 182 N. C., 325, 109 S. E., 43; Holland v. Dulin, ante, 211; Shipp v. Stage Lines, 192 N. C., 475, 135 S. E., 339.

In an action to avoid an instrument on the ground of fraud, non est factum, it is provided by C. S., 441, subsection 9, that suit shall be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrues; that is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ewbank v. . LymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Walker v. . BurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. In Re ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted, Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Leggett v. Southeastern People's College, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API