Legal Opinion

Saberton v. Greenwald

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1946No. 30454PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The record presents the question whether the action of the trial court and the approval of such action by the Court of Appeals in denying plaintiff the right to recover punitive damages under the facts of this case constitutes error.

To be determined first is whether the action sounds in tort or contract. If ex contractu, it is to be dis posed of on the authority of Ketcham v. Miller, 104 Ohio St., 372,136 N. E., 145, wherein it was held:

“Punitive damages are not recoverable in an action for breach of contract.”

On the other hand, if this be an action ex clelicto, it is to be governed by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tracy v. Athens & Pomeroy Coal & Land Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API