Aldridge v. General Motors Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Judge.
The within action is a suit at law for damages for alleged infringement of a patent. The plaintiff seeks no equitable relief, and has demanded a jury trial.
The defendant has answered with the usual denials and allegations, and by Paragraph 11 of its Answer raises the issue of file-wrapper estoppel on the question of infringement by defendant’s device, in the following language:
“11. Further answering the complaint, defendant alleges that by reason of the proceedings in the United States Patent Office during the prosecution of the application which resulted in said Letters…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Cataphote Corporation v. DeSoto Chemical Coatings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1964
- United States ex rel. Fogle v. Hal B. Hayes & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1963
- Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973