Legal Opinion
Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 31, 1973No. 71 Civ. 3781PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BAUMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff is the holder of a patent covering the use of electronic data processing systems in off track betting. It alleges that New York City, its Off-Track Betting Corporation (OTB) and various companies providing the OTB operation with computerized data processing systems are infringing upon its patent. Jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Each of the defendant computer companies is charged with infringement by reason of the particular system it has provided OTB. OTB and New York City are claimed to have infringed plaintiff’s patent by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Cataphote Corporation, a Corporation v. De Soto Chemical Coatings, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Kent Industries, Inc., Sidney L. Caplan, Delores M. Caplan, Anne J. MossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Magnavox Co. v. APF Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Ludlow Corp. v. Textile Rubber & Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978