Cataphote Corporation v. DeSoto Chemical Coatings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
The issue presently before the Court in this patent litigation is raised by defendant’s motion for a separate trial (Rule 42[b], Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.) on the issue whether plaintiff’s alleged invention is invalid because placed in public use or on sale in this country more than one year prior to the date of application for said patent within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
Defendant’s motion is based upon Plaintiff’s Answers to Interrogatories of Defendant filed November 20, 1962 and January 31, 1963; Plaintiff’s Answers to Defendant’s Request for Admissions,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Del Mar Engineering Laboratories v. Physio-Tronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Bruce A. Kock v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- HeinemannUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.