Legal Opinion
Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1973No. 72-1643PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc., defendants in a patent infringement action brought by Mobil Oil Corporation in the district court for the Central District of California, petition this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district judge (1) to vacate his order denying a stay of the proceedings pending the outcome of similar litigation in the district court for the District of Connecticut and granting Mobil’s motion for a separate trial limited solely to the issue of patent infringement and (2) to enter an order staying proceedings in the California action…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- The Ohio Environmental Council v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Gen-Probe, Inc. v. Amoco Corp., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Fred Schakel DairyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Sidney B. Weiner v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.