Legal Opinion
Travelli v. Bowman
California Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1907No. L.A. No. 1653PublishedCited by 20 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This action was brought against M. S. Bowman, administrator of the estate of George R. Senior, deceased, to obtain a judgment reforming the description of land in a certain deed of trust. Judgment went for plaintiffs, in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, and from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial the defendant appeals.
The main features of the case are these: In March, 1896, George R. Senior, sincé deceased, was, and for a long time prior thereto had been, indebted to the plaintiff Travelli in a large sum of money, secured by a mortgage on certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Weber v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Thompson v. Phœnix Ins.United States Circuit Court · 1885
3Cited by20 opinions
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Flack v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.