Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Continental Airlines

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1970No. Civ. 36117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to vacate a default and set aside a default judgment subsequently entered against it in the sum of $102,962 (damages for personal injuries), the grounds of which were inadvertence, mistake and excusable neglect (Code Civ. Proc., § 473). He claims the supporting declarations are devoid of any showing which warranted the relief sought, hence it was an abuse of discretion for the court to grant such relief.

From the complaint and the default hearing, it appears that plaintiff’s injuries were sustained on October 18,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hanooka v. PivkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Bellm v. BelliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Nicholson v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Robinson v. VarelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API