Legal Opinion
Nicholson v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1980No. Civ. 57465PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, Acting P. J.
Defendants Mason Rose and Pacific Institute for Advanced Studies (PIAS) appeal a default judgment against them and the denial of their motion to vacate the judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 473).
Facts
Plaintiff Sylvia Nicholson, interested in community affairs, met defendant Rose in 1971 during the course of pursuing this interest. Rose told her he was an ordained minister, that he and his organization, Pacific Institute for Advanced Studies (PIAS), shared her interest in community affairs. Rose induced plaintiff to lend PIAS $23,500, to enable PIAS to purchase certain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Horn v. Guaranty Chevrolet MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Coats v. Construction & General Laborers Local No. 185California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Credit Managers Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Slusher v. DurrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re Rexplore, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Bosio v. Norbay Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Estate of SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bellm v. BelliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.