Legal Opinion

Weitz v. Yankosky

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1966No. L.A. 28497PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Plaintiff Weitz appeals from an order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment against defendant Yankosky.

The facts set forth in the affidavits and points and authorities of the parties are as follows:

On April 19, 1961, defendant backed his automobile out of a private driveway, and plaintiff, in his automobile, ran into defendant’s ear. After reporting the accident to the police department, defendant telephoned his insurance agent, Mr. Needham, informing him of the accident. Defendant then filed an SR-1 form with the Department of Motor Vehicles, stating that he had an automobile…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API