Legal Opinion
State v. Daley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 1987No. 5220PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
After a trial to a jury, the defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a). The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendant to rehabilitate a witness after the witness’ credibility was attacked on cross-examination. We find no error.
An issue at the trial was whether the defendant was operating the motor vehicle which was owned by Theodore Levesque. The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. When a Waterford police officer observed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. ConrodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. SenquizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. DennisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. IversonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. SolomonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014