Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gabrielli, J.

In this case, we are called upon to consider whether and under what circumstances a criminal defendant is entitled to have the jury informed that one or more of his witnesses was rendered unavailable to testify as a result of the witness’ own decision to invoke his constitutional privilege against self incrimination. Although we conclude that no such explanatory instruction was required under the circumstances of this case, we hasten to add that there may be instances in which a proper neutralizing instruction is necessary in order to correct any misimpression…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. People v. WhisbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Charles C. Greiner v. Ronald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. People v. BergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. Melvin P. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API