Legal Opinion

State v. Dennison

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 24, 1991No. 14289PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The issues raised in this appeal are grounded upon the ruling of the trial court requiring a defense witness, Richard Clark, to invoke his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination in the presence of the jury during cross-examination by the state. The Appellate Court refused to consider this claim because it concluded that the defendant, Eddie Dennison, had failed to state “distinctly” the reasons for his objections as required by Practice Book §§ 288 and 4185, and also declared that, even if the claims had been considered, the court “would find them without merit.” State v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. United States v. Robert William Maloney, Robert Murphy and Paul MerrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. CavellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. PaulinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. JOSE G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API