State v. Iverson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Bruce Iverson, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 *170On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) ruled that he could not ask his own witness a question in the presence of the jury, knowing that the witness intended to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination in response to that question, and (2) denied his “motion to reopen the evidence and, in the alternative, for a mistrial.” We affirm the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Eugene Jerome Joseph Klein v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Robert Abrams, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Remax Right Choice v. AryehConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. O'DonnellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Walton v. Warden, State Prison, No. Cv 91 1282 S (May 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998