Legal Opinion

State v. Iverson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 17, 1998No. AC 16029PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant, Bruce Iverson, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 *170On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) ruled that he could not ask his own witness a question in the presence of the jury, knowing that the witness intended to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination in response to that question, and (2) denied his “motion to reopen the evidence and, in the alternative, for a mistrial.” We affirm the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Eugene Jerome Joseph Klein v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Robert Abrams, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Remax Right Choice v. AryehConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. State v. O'DonnellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Walton v. Warden, State Prison, No. Cv 91 1282 S (May 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API