Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2010No. B220016PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

The Labor Code1 provides that the labor conditions set by the Industrial Welfare Commission (Commission) shall be the standard labor conditions for employees. A Commission wage order provides that employees shall be provided suitable seating, if reasonable, during the performance of their duties. The Labor Code also establishes the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (§ 2698 et seq.), which allows an employee to bring an action for civil penalties for violations of provisions of the Labor Code, except those provisions for which a civil penalty is provided (§…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Green v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. McKenzie v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Pickett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API