Legal Opinion
Pickett v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 2012No. B238175PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*890Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Shelley Pickett’s action that included a Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) (PAGA) claim was deemed related to a prior-filed PAGA action brought by Eugina Bright, against the same defendant on similar allegations, although the remedies sought were not identical. Upon Pickett’s action being reassigned to the all-purpose judge in the prior-filed action, but not consolidated with that first action, Pickett timely filed a peremptory challenge to the trial judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6.1 The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Entente Design, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Birts v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sunrise Fin., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Maas v. Super. CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.