Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goethe

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1911No. Sac. No. 1686PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Upon the former submission of this appeal the judgment was reversed for reasons stated in an opinion which, except for some minor alterations, reads as follows

“This is an appeal taken from a judgment within sixty days after its rendition. The transcript contains a bill of exceptions setting forth the evidence and proceedings on the trial.
“In support of his appeal the appellant assigns errors of law occurring at the trial and the insufficiency of the evidence to support the decision. This makes it necessary to consider the motion of the respondents, made to this court, to strike the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Stevenson v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Smith v. MoynihanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Mandeville v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Dunn v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Crystal Sugar Co. v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wilson v. LinderIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Peterson v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Cooper v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API