Dunn v. Price
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action to recover the posession or value, alleged to be four hundred and sixteen dollars, of four horses and two sets of harness, with damages for the detention thereof. The answer denied that the plaintiff was the owner or entitled to the possession of the described property, or of any part thereof, at the time of the commencement of the action or at any time prior thereto, and denied that defendants had ever unlawfully withheld or detained said property, or any of the same, from the possession of the plaintiff.
The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lowell Manufacturing Co. v. Safeguard Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Darby v. Arrowhead Hot Springs Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by19 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- O'shea v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Luckie v. Diamond Coal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Jegen v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bickerdike v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.