Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Spring Valley Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1915No. S. F. No. 6219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal is from the judgment and it was taken within sixty days after the entry thereof.

The action concerns a certain certificate of stock numbered 20,484 for forty shares of the capital stock of the defendant company. The plaintiff alleges that on May 4, 1899, Lochhead died the owner of said stock and certificate and that thereafter defendant converted the same to its own use. The answer denies that Lochhead was the owner of said certificate or shares and also denies that defendant converted the same to its own use.

The action has already been the subject of two appeals. Upon the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. GoetheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cooper v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Baxter v. Boston-Pacific Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API