Otten v. Spreckels
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The cause has been tried twice. Upon the first trial a verdict was returned for the plaintiff and a new trial was thereupon ordered. From this order the plaintiff appealed. The appeal came before the district court of the third district for decision and the order was affirmed. (24 Cal. App. 251, [141 Pac. 224].) The plaintiff applied to the supreme court for a rehearing and it was denied. The respondent contends that the decision of the district court upon the appeal from the order granting a new trial constitutes the law of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Allen v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.