Preload Enterprises, Inc. v. Pacific Bridge Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is a suit which seeks recovery for four causes of action: patent infringement, trademark infringement, unfair competition and unjust enrichment. The present questions arise upon motions made by the defendant under Rule 12, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the complaint and the causes of action therein set out. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint and all causes of action therein for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, because the acts of the defendant complained of were' done under a license granted to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Paulus v. M. M. Buck Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
- Moto Meter Co. v. National Gauge & Equipment Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Access Beyond Technologies, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Young v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Calgon Corp. v. Nalco Chemical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Edwin K. Williams & Co., Inc. v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-E.District Court, C.D. California · 1974
- Houdry Process Corp. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.