Legal Opinion

Paulus v. M. M. Buck Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1904No. 1,968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree which dismissed a bill for relief from an infringement of letters patent No. 428,516, for improvements in railway drills, issued to the complainant Aaron R. Paulus on May 20, 1890. On June 14, 1890, he conveyed an undivided one-fourth of his interest in the patent to his co-complainant, William W. Ellis. The issue in this case is one of title, and not one of impinging inventions. The complainants’ title, as the record discloses it, has been stated. This is the title of the defendants: On February 24, 1890, Paulus made a written agreement…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  2. Piantadosi v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Munn v. Des Moines Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Willson v. Graphol Products Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API