Legal Opinion
Edwin K. Williams & Co., Inc. v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-E.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 18, 1974No. 70-2037-DWWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Beginning about 1935 Edwin K. Williams engaged in the business of designing and providing bookkeeping and business management systems for oil companies and record-keeping books for service station dealers, and of furnishing counseling services to aid them in inventory control, record keeping and the orderly operation of their business. His business was operated under the name of Edwin K. Williams and Co. and he has used various other designations, trademarks and trade names including “Profit Guide,” “Quick Sales Recorder,” “Profit Analyzer” and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reynolds v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Edwin K. Williams & Co., Inc., a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-East, a Virginia Corporation, and Marcoin, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Edwin K. Williams & Co.-East, Inc., on the Counterclaims-Appellant v. Edwin K. Williams & Co., Inc., on the Counterclaims-Appellee, and Kemp Printing Co. And Mrs. E. K. Williams, Additional on the Counterclaims-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Edwin K. Williams & Co. v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-EastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Akron Tire Supply Company v. Gebr. Hofmann KGDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1975
- Reynolds v. ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000