Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Beal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1985No. C5-82-466PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, James V. Beal, charging him with numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee appointed by this court found facts supporting several of the alleged violations and recommended that respondent be placed on probation for 3 years. Subsequent to the referee’s findings, the LPRB filed a supplemental petition charging two additional counts of professional misconduct. The same referee, in a supplemental hearing, found facts supporting one of the counts and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API