State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Circuit Court for Waukesha County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Is this am appropriate case for exercise of superintending control? A writ of prohibition may be invoked in cases of nonjurisdictional error where appeal from the error may come too late for effective redress, or be inadequate, and there is need for such intervention to avoid *315grave hardship or a complete denial of the rights of a litigant.1 If relators Gutschenritter and Koepp comply with the order of the circuit court, any right they have to withhold testimony, and any right the state has to have such testimony withheld, will have been destroyed. An appeal could not repair the damage. If…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- In re PhelanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Philler v. Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Granger v. WisnerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State Highway Commission v. EarlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.