Legal Opinion

Granger v. Wisner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1982No. 15846PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries which plaintiff alleged she sustained as a result of the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 19(e), 17A A.R.S.

On December 21,1973, plaintiff consulted the defendant, a plastic surgeon, concerning cosmetic surgery. The defendant examined the plaintiff on that occasion and found that she would benefit cosmetically from plastic…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Arthur Clark v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. State v. SchaafArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. General Motors Corp. v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API