Legal Opinion
United States v. Horace Meyer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1968No. 21127PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
The United States instituted this proceeding to. condemn privately-held land within the boundaries of Yosemite National Park, California. Appellee-land-owner issued notices under Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the taking of the depositions of three real estate appraisers employed by the government to appraise the condemned property, and served each appraiser with a subpoena under Rule 45(b) calling for the production of documents relating to the action. 1
The government moved under Rule 30 (b) for a protective order to provide as follows:
“1. That the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. Ray B. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.