State Highway Commission v. Earl
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Judge.
During the course of trial of-this condemnation action the State 'subpoenaed a realtor, Erwin Asmussen, who had made an appraisal of the condemned property for defendant landowner. However, he was not called by defendant. When the State sought to examine Asmussen the trial court granted defendant's motion to suppress the same. The record is silent as to the grounds of the motion or the trial court's reason for exclusion. Thereafter, the State offered to prove Asmussen would testify, if allowed, that just compensation for defendant's property taken and damaged by the State was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- State v. BiggersTexas Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Catch the BearSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Town of Thomaston v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.